Learn the latest on Mastering Artificial Intelligence & ChatGPT Law with this convenient, 24/7 On-demand Seminar and Complimentary Podcast. Register to obtain CLE and MCLE credit, online access to complete course and reference materials, and attend this on-demand seminar. YOU MAY LISTEN FROM ALMOST ANY TYPE OF COMPUTER OR IPOD. ACCESS TO THE RECORDING AND MATERIALS DOES NOT EXPIRE.

Benefits:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT are estimated to generate or save $26 trillion per year in the global economy. Effectively utilizing and implementing cutting-edge artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and Generative AI technologies in your law practice and office offer immediate cost savings and increased profitability. Understanding the latest tools, practices, and technology is essential to best understand the latest case law, regulations, ethical considerations, and pitfalls in a rapidly evolving practice area. Our faculty features several leading authorities in the field, who will cover the application of AI, ChatGPT, and AI-powered technology to machine learning, generative AI, using technology to improve client and opposing counsel communications, intellectual property, and generating savings. The faculty will also discuss future legal developments, rule changes, and pending legislation. Registration includes online access to course and reference materials that serve as a helpful guide to the many topics and techniques discussed in the program.

Agenda:

a. Cutting-Edge Developments in Artificial Intelligence in 2024

b. Implementing AI, ChatGPT, and AI-Powered Technology in Your Law Practice

c. Demystifying Generative Artificial Intelligence

d. Current Caselaw & Regulations Affecting the Industry

e. AI Legal Applications

f. Intellectual Property Rights & Data Rights

g. Protecting Data Rights from the Time of Generation

h. Licensing, Due Diligence, and Privacy Issues

i. Integrating Technology to Improve Communications with Clients and Opposing Counsel

j. Legal Issues involved with Machine Learning, Data Science, and Analytics

k. Avoiding Legel Ethical Pitfalls

l. Future Statutory Rules

Recorded Question & Answer Session

Biography of Seminar Faculty:

1. Eran Kahana is Counsel at Maslon LLP, where he focuses on cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and intellectual property law. Mr. Kahana is a fellow at Stanford Law School, a member of the advisory board of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Law Society, an adjunct professor of law at the University of Minnesota Law School, a member of the Scientific Council of the Israeli Association for Ethics in Artificial Intelligence, and a co-author of The Law of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Machines, a publication of the American Bar Association. He is a graduate of the FBI's Citizen Academy and works closely with the FBI, Department of Justice, Secret Service, and colleagues from the private and academic sectors to promote, educate, and sustain cybersecurity best practices. To that end, he serves as general counsel of InfraGard and as a member of the Governance Committee of the InfraGard National Members Alliance, organizations affiliated with the FBI. Mr. Kahana has been interviewed on artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, privacy, and technology law for Bloomberg Law, BBC, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), KABC Radio, WCCO Radio, Minnesota Public Radio, Star Tribune, TheStreet.com, Stanford University Radio, KZSU FM, Twin Cities Business magazine, and Quartz.

2. James G. Gatto is a Partner at Sheppard Mullin LLP, where he is the Co-Leader of the Artificial Intelligence Team, the Blockchain & Fintech Team, and Leader of the Open Source Team. He leverages his unique combination of nearly 30 years of IP experience, business insights and attention to technology trends to help companies develop IP and other legal strategies that are aligned with their business objectives. His practice focuses on all aspects of intellectual property, internet and technology law, including patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret and open source. Mr. Gatto advises clients of all sizes (startups to Fortune 100 companies) on key legal and business issues relating to the use of social media, video games, social games and online gambling (gamblification), virtual goods and currency, social networks, virtual worlds, mirror worlds, augmented reality, open source user-generated content, location-based services and gamification. He regularly advises internet and social media companies on business and legal strategies relating to virtual goods and virtual currency, developing IP protection and monetization strategies, handling terms of service and end user license agreements, development, licensing and partnership agreements, developing DMCA policies, handling DMCA enforcement, privacy and COPPA policies and much more. Jim advises clients on intellectual property and technology agreements related to ESG and Sustainability. Among other projects, he has advised on use of blockchain for tracking and transferring carbon credits. Mr. Gatto is a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center.

3. Dan Tysver is a Partner at Forsgren Fisher McCalmont DeMarea Tysver LLP. In his almost 30 years of experience as a patent attorney, Mr. Tysver has focused primarily on the areas of computer software, mobile-device apps, consumer electronics, data storage, and medical devices. This depth of experience allows Mr. Tysver to handle complex matters, ranging from high-tech inventions to patent applications struggling through the challenges of subject-matter eligibility. He assists clients in drafting and prosecuting patent applications, as well as litigation, patent strategy, and the development of invalidity and non-infringement opinions. When working with clients, Mr. Tysver usually functions as the company’s primary outside counsel for patent and other intellectual-property issues. Mr. Tysver represents clients ranging in size from the Fortune 100 to start-up companies and solo inventors. He founded and ran his own patent-prosecution boutique law firm for over twenty years before joining FFMDT. He is the author of BitLaw, an award-winning website that provides legal information on intellectual property and the protection of computer “bits.” He has drafted patents covering many different computing technologies, including storage area networks (SANs), file systems, digital-rights management, databases, and Internet business processes. He has also drafted patents on non-computer technologies ranging from medical devices and camera systems to sporting equipment. Because of his long history of prosecuting software-related patent applications, Mr. Tysver has significant experience in dealing with Section 101 (subject-matter eligibility) issues in front of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He has lectured frequently on this subject, has written on how to handle Section 101 rejections in BitLaw, and is frequently brought in by clients to handle applications that have floundered under Section 101 rejections and to advise on the enforceability of issued patents. He is a graduate of Harvard Law School.

CLE Credit: Rossdale CLE is a national leader in attorney education and has trained thousands of attorneys, paralegals, and other legal professionals.

Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission for 1.5 MCLE credits

Alaska Bar Association for 1.5 CLE Credits *

Arizona State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits**

Arkansas Supreme Court - Office of Prof. Programs for 1.5 CLE credits

California State Bar for 1.5 MCLE credits

Colorado Supreme Court Board of Continuing Legal and Judicial Education for 1.8 CLE Credits

Connecticut for 1.5 CLE Credits

Delaware Commission on Continuing Legal Education *******

District of Columbia (CLE credits are not required)***

Florida Bar for 2.0 CLE credits

Georgia Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Hawaii State for 1.5 CLE credits

Idaho State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE Credits

Iowa Commission on Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE Credits

Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission for 1.5 CLE Credits

Kentucky Bar Association for 1.5 CLE Credits

Louisiana Supreme Court Commission on MCLE for 1.5 MCLE credits

Maryland (CLE credits are not required)***

Massachusetts (CLE credits are not required)**

Michigan (CLE credits are not required)***

Minnesota State Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

Mississippi Commission on Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

Missouri Bar for 1.8 MCLE Credits

Montana Commission of CLE for 1.5 CLE Credits

Nevada Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

New Hampshire for 1.5 CLE credits ****

New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits (per Rule 201:4)

New Mexico Minimum Continuing Legal Education Board for 1.5 CLE credits

New York State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

North Carolina State Bar Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

Ohio - Supreme Court of Ohio Commission on CLE for 1.5 CLE Credits

Oklahoma Bar Association for 1.5 CLE Credits

Oregon Bar for 1.5 MCLE Credits

Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board for 1.5 CLE Credits

Puerto Rico for 1.5 CLE credits (Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico)

South Dakota (CLE credits are not required)***

Tennessee Commission on CLE for 1.5 CLE Credits

Texas State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Utah State Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 MCLE credits

Vermont Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Board for 1.5 CLE credits

Virginia State Bar for 1.5 MCLE credits

Washington for 1.5 CLE credits

West Virginia for 1.8 CLE credits

Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners for 1.5 CLE credits

Wyoming State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Additional States - call customer service at (888) 626-3462

* Members of the Alaska Bar Association may report 1.5 CLE credits for participating in this course as it has been approved by other mandatory CLE jurisdictions for 1.5 CLE credits.

** The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. This activity may qualify for up to 1.5 hours toward your annual CLE requirement for the State Bar of Arizona, including 0 hour(s) of professional responsibility.

*** States that do not require CLE are indicated above. Rossdale does not apply for CLE in these states as CLE credit is not required.

**** The New Hampshire does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Continuing Legal Education requirement. Pursuant to NH Supreme Court Rule 53, this activity may be counted for up to 1.5 CLE hours.

******* Please include your DE Bar Number so a Form 4 may be forwarded to you after the course.

For additional questions, please call 888-626-3462.

REGISTER FOR CLE CREDIT AND LISTEN & LEARN AT YOUR CONVENIENCE WITH THIS CONVENIENT 24/7 ON-DEMAND SEMINAR & PODCAST.

You will receive an on-demand download of the seminar, accompanying materials, and information to report the CLE credits as soon as you register with a credit card or when we process your check.