Learn the latest on Mastering Unmanned Aircraft Systems [Drones] Law & Regulation with this convenient, 24/7 On-demand Seminar & Complimentary Podcast. Register to obtain CLE & MCLE credit, online access to complete course & reference materials, and attend this on-demand seminar. YOU MAY LISTEN FROM ALMOST ANY TYPE OF COMPUTER OR IPOD. ACCESS TO THE RECORDING AND MATERIALS DOES NOT EXPIRE.

Benefits:

The huge expansion in both commercial and recreational uses of unmanned aircraft systems or drones across the nation and globally has led to a significant need for attorneys proficient in the cutting-edge use of related legal and regulatory issues. The laws vary greatly and have been in flux with the proliferation of clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies, governments, to small businesses and private individuals seeking to take advantage of this growing technology. The faculty for this seminar features several leading authorities on the subject. This comprehensive program on drone law and regulation will introduce you to the most relevant issues and practical solutions, including developing a drone law practice, the latest federal regulations, cutting-edge state laws on drones, legal issues relating to privacy & security, as well as air rights property law. The faculty will also cover the changes and progress on the latest legal developments and future regulations. Registration includes online access to course and reference materials that serve as a helpful guide to the numerous topics and techniques discussed in the program.

Agenda:

Mastering Drone & Unmanned Aircraft Systems Regulation CLE:

a. Growing Your Unmanned Aircraft Systems Law Practice

b. Federal Aviation Administration's Latest Changes affecting Drone Regulations

c. Successfully Handling Enforcement Actions

d. Effectively Understanding Commercial Drone Laws

e. Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Surveillance

f. Legal Issues relating to Privacy & Security

g. Best Practices on Air Rights Property Law

h. Cutting-Edge State Laws on Drones

i. Compliance & Avoidance Strategies

j. Advising Clients on use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Recorded Question & Answer Session

Biography of Seminar Faculty:

1. Robert Ellis is a Partner at Hennis Rothstein Ellis LLP, where he practices in the areas of technology law, corporate law, transitional & securities law, intellectual property law, estate planning, and drone law (law of Unmanned Aerial Systems or UAS). Mr. Ellis is a highly sought-after author and lecturer, having penned the 2016 edition of Stuckey & Ellis, Internet and Online Law (Law Journal Press) and numerous articles & op-ed pieces regarding legal topics. His recent articles cover Drone Law (Drones and the Law: What You Need to Know), Digital Estate Planning ( Estate Planning in the Age of Digital Possessions), Bitcoin ( What’s the Deal with Bitcoin?), and Online Privacy (The New Privacy: Internet Laws for a Hyper-Public World). He has twice testified before Congress on information law topics. Mr. Ellis has served as chair of his state Bar's International Law Committee, as chair of its Digital Technology Law Committee, and as a member of its Ad Hoc Committee on Multijurisdictional Practice. Mr. Ellis is a former Fulbright Scholar and veteran of the U.S. Army. He is a longtime aircraft owner and pilot.

2. Lydia M. Hilton practices at Berman Fink Van Horn PC, where she brings more than 25 years of legal experience to her drone and unmanned aircraft systems law practice. An advisor on day-to-day operational and compliance matters, Ms. Hilton devises strategies to mitigate risks and achieve her client’s business goals. In the drone arena, she addresses the legal implications of businesses that are considering or operating a drone program, including the liabilities of drone operation to provide advice; business documents; privacy policies; compliance; NDAs; and litigation services. A member of the Aviation Section of her state bar, Ms. Hilton co-authored and co-anchored the State Bar’s public safety announcement regarding the safe flying of small UAS. She has spoken and written widely on unmanned aircraft and drone. Ms. Hilton received her law degree from Emory University School of Law.

3. Dean Griffith practices at Jones Days, where he focuses on aviation regulatory matters, drawing on his nearly 10-year career at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Mr. Griffith's experience ranges from traditional aircraft regulation to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), or drone, law and policy. He advises domestic and international clients on FAA safety and certification requirements, aircraft registration standards, use of corporate aircraft, airspace obstruction evaluation requirements, as well as international aviation regulations. He also assists clients with UAS regulatory compliance and operational approvals, corporate UAS policies, and review of proposed legislation and regulations. As a regulatory lawyer in the FAA's Office of the Chief Counsel, Mr. Griffith drafted safety regulations and was responsible for seeing them through the notice and comment process, including Office of Management and Budget Review. He also prepared legal interpretations and regulatory exemptions addressing air carriers, corporate aviation, helicopter air ambulance operations, and other commercial aviation matters. Dean has deep experience and knowledge of unmanned aircraft systems law and policy. As the Chief Counsel's UAS regulatory policy team lead, he counseled agency decision makers on rulemaking, exemptions, and policy development related to unmanned aircraft. Dean advised on the creation of the "Section 333" exemption process, the UAS Pathfinder Program, and on the scope of the agency's jurisdiction to regulate drones. Additionally, Mr. Jones served as senior advisor and acting deputy assistant administrator in the FAA's Office of Government and Industry Affairs, advising on matters concerning Congress, aviation industry groups, and other governmental organizations.

Attend this 24/7 on-demand recording & podcast for CLE & MCLE credit with the following pending, available, & approved jurisdictions:

Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission for 1.5 MCLE credits

Alaska Bar Association for 1.5 CLE Credits *

Arizona State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits**

California State Bar for 1.5 MCLE credits

Colorado Supreme Court Board of Continuing Legal & Judicial Education for 1.8 CLE Credits

Connecticut for 1.5 CLE Credits

District of Columbia (CLE credits are not required)***

Florida Bar for 2.0 CLE credits

Georgia Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Hawaii State Board of CLE for 1.5 CLE credits

Idaho State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Indiana Commission for Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE Credits

Iowa Commission on Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE Credits

Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission for 1.5 CLE Credits

Kentucky Bar Association for 1.5 CLE Credits

Louisiana Supreme Court Commission on MCLE for 1.5 MCLE credits

Maryland (CLE credits are not required)***

Massachusetts (CLE credits are not required)**

Michigan (CLE credits are not required)***

Minnesota State Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

Mississippi Commission on Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

Missouri Bar for 1.8 MCLE Credits

Montana Commission of CLE for 1.5 CLE Credits

Nevada Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

New Hampshire for 1.5 CLE credits ****

New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits (per Rule 201:4)

New Mexico Minimum Continuing Legal Education Board for 1.5 CLE credits

New York State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

North Carolina State Bar Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 CLE credits

Ohio - Supreme Court of Ohio Commission on CLE for 1.5 CLE Credits

Oregon State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board for 1.5 CLE Credits

Puerto Rico for 1.5 CLE credits (Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico)

Rhode Island Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission for 1.5 CLE credits

South Dakota (CLE credits are not required)***

Tennessee Commission on CLE for 1.5 CLE Credits

Texas State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Utah State Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 MCLE credits

Vermont Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Board for 1.5 CLE credits

Virginia State Bar for 1.5 MCLE credits

Washington State Board of Continuing Legal Education for 1.5 MCLE credits

Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners for 1.5 CLE credits

Wyoming State Bar for 1.5 CLE credits

Additional States - call customer service at (888) 626-3462

* Members of the Alaska Bar Association may report 1.5 CLE credits for participating in this course as it has been approved by other mandatory CLE jurisdictions for 1.5 CLE credits.

** The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. This activity may qualify for up to 1.5 hours toward your annual CLE requirement for the State Bar of Arizona, including 0 hour(s) of professional responsibility.

*** States that do not require CLE are indicated above. Rossdale does not apply for CLE in these states as CLE credit is not required.

**** The New Hampshire does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Continuing Legal Education requirement. Pursuant to NH Supreme Court Rule 53, this activity may be counted for up to 1.5 CLE hours.

For additional questions, please call 888-626-3462.

You will receive access to recording, podcast, course & reference material, and information related to CLE/MCLE credit as soon as you register with a credit card or when your check is processed.

You will receive an on-demand download of the seminar, accompanying materials, and information to report the CLE credits as soon as you register with a credit card or when we process your check.